1963 DAF 600 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DAF 600 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 277 more horse power than 1963 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1032 kg more than 1963 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (427 Nm) has 382 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DAF 600 | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | 600 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 427 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 90.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 90 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1662 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2620 mm |