1963 DAF 600 vs. 2004 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2004 Toyota Tundra is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DAF 600 would be higher. At 3,376 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Tundra (188 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1963 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1963 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1386 kg more than 1963 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Tundra (298 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DAF 600 | 2004 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | DAF | Toyota |
| Model | 600 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 3376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 188 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 93 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 82 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2016 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3270 mm |
