1963 DAF 600 vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DAF 600 would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 263 more horse power than 1963 DAF 600. (19 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1963 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1810 kg more than 1963 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 396 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DAF 600 | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | DAF | Land Rover |
| Model | 600 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 282 HP |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 441 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2890 mm |
