1963 DAF 600 vs. 2005 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tundra is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DAF 600 would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1963 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1963 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1261 kg more than 1963 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Tundra (382 Nm) has 337 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DAF 600 | 2005 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | DAF | Toyota |
Model | 600 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 3950 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 382 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1891 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3270 mm |