1963 DAF 600 vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DAF 600 would be higher. At 1,798 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda 6 (119 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 1963 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mazda 6 weights approximately 715 kg more than 1963 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda 6 (165 Nm) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2006 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DAF 600 | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | 600 | 6 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 165 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 83.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2680 mm |