1963 DAF 600 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DAF 600 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (548 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 529 more horse power than 1963 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1963 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 1284 kg more than 1963 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V (747 Nm) has 702 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DAF 600 | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | DAF | Cadillac |
Model | 600 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 590 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 19 HP | 548 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 45 Nm | 747 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 1914 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1884 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2880 mm |