1963 DAF 600 vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DAF 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DAF 600 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (397 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 378 more horse power than 1963 DAF 600. (19 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 1963 DAF 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 2083 kg more than 1963 DAF 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (565 Nm) has 520 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DAF 600. (45 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DAF 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DAF 600 | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
| Make | DAF | Cadillac |
| Model | 600 | ESCALADE |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 590 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 397 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 45 Nm | 565 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 103 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 65 mm | 92 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 630 kg | 2713 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5662 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2009 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1918 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3302 mm |
