1963 DKW F 11 vs. 1950 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1963 DKW F 11 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1950 Jeep CJ3A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1950 Jeep CJ3A (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Jeep CJ3A weights approximately 360 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1950 Jeep CJ3A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 DKW F 11. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1950 Jeep CJ3A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW F 11 | 1950 Jeep CJ3A | |
| Make | DKW | Jeep |
| Model | F 11 | CJ3A |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 889 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2040 mm |
