1963 DKW F 11 vs. 1965 Mini MK I
To start off, 1965 Mini MK I is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 846 cc (4 cylinders), 1965 Mini MK I is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 34 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW F 11 weights approximately 115 kg more than 1965 Mini MK I.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 DKW F 11 (71 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1963 DKW F 11 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 1965 Mini MK I | |
Make | DKW | Mini |
Model | F 11 | MK I |
Year Released | 1963 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 794 cc | 846 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 60 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2040 mm |