1963 DKW F 11 vs. 1966 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1966 Ford Mustang is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 6,385 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Mustang (320 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 282 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Mustang weights approximately 429 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW F 11 | 1966 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | F 11 | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 889 cc | 6385 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 320 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1179 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 45 L |
