1963 DKW F 11 vs. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 4,259 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 390 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW F 11 | 1966 Sunbeam Tiger | |
| Make | DKW | Sunbeam |
| Model | F 11 | Tiger |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1966 |
| Engine Size | 889 cc | 4259 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1140 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 27 L |
