1963 DKW F 11 vs. 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 6,229 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 1350 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11.
Because 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW F 11 | 1968 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | DKW | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | F 11 | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 889 cc | 6229 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 2100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 109 L |
