1963 DKW F 11 vs. 1975 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1975 Nissan Cedric is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 2,164 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Nissan Cedric (60 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 615 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1975 Nissan Cedric is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Nissan Cedric. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW F 11 | 1975 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | DKW | Nissan |
| Model | F 11 | Cedric |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 889 cc | 2164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 60 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1365 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2700 mm |
