1963 DKW F 11 vs. 1976 Datsun 280Z
To start off, 1976 Datsun 280Z is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Datsun 280Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Datsun 280Z (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Datsun 280Z should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Datsun 280Z weights approximately 554 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Datsun 280Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Datsun 280Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 1976 Datsun 280Z | |
Make | DKW | Datsun |
Model | F 11 | 280Z |
Year Released | 1963 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 889 cc | 2753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1304 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4399 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2304 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 60 L |