1963 DKW F 11 vs. 1982 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1982 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 1,272 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Volkswagen Polo (53 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 DKW F 11 weights approximately 20 kg more than 1982 Volkswagen Polo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 1982 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | DKW | Volkswagen |
Model | F 11 | Polo |
Year Released | 1963 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 889 cc | 1272 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 40 L |