1963 DKW F 11 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1982 Zastava 102 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Zastava 102 (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Zastava 102 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DKW F 11. (71 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1982 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
Make | DKW | Zastava |
Model | F 11 | 102 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1982 |
Engine Size | 794 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2160 mm |