1963 DKW F 11 vs. 1984 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1984 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 1,272 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Volkswagen Polo (53 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Volkswagen Polo (97 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DKW F 11. (71 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1984 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW F 11 | 1984 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | DKW | Volkswagen |
| Model | F 11 | Polo |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 794 cc | 1272 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 97 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 72 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 730 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2400 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 40 L |
