1963 DKW F 11 vs. 1990 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1990 Jaguar XJR is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 3,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Jaguar XJR (252 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 743 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1990 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 1990 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | DKW | Jaguar |
Model | F 11 | XJR |
Year Released | 1963 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 889 cc | 3979 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1493 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2880 mm |