1963 DKW F 11 vs. 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass (158 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 695 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | DKW | Oldsmobile |
Model | F 11 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1963 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 889 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1445 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2740 mm |