1963 DKW F 11 vs. 1992 Holden Apollo
To start off, 1992 Holden Apollo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Holden Apollo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Holden Apollo (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Holden Apollo should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Holden Apollo weights approximately 455 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 1992 Holden Apollo | |
Make | DKW | Holden |
Model | F 11 | Apollo |
Year Released | 1963 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 889 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2610 mm |