1963 DKW F 11 vs. 1995 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 1995 Suzuki Swift is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 1,298 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Suzuki Swift is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Suzuki Swift (66 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Suzuki Swift should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Suzuki Swift weights approximately 100 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Suzuki Swift (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DKW F 11. (71 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1995 Suzuki Swift will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 1995 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | DKW | Suzuki |
Model | F 11 | Swift |
Year Released | 1963 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 794 cc | 1298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 75.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 830 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1590 mm |