1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass (150 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 650 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | DKW | Oldsmobile |
Model | F 11 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 889 cc | 3135 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 76 L |