1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2000 Tata E
To start off, 2000 Tata E is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Tata E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Tata E (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Tata E should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Tata E weights approximately 620 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Tata E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Tata E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 2000 Tata E | |
Make | DKW | Tata |
Model | F 11 | E |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 889 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2810 mm |