1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2001 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2001 Ford Mustang is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 226 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Mustang weights approximately 568 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Mustang (410 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DKW F 11. (71 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2001 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 2001 Ford Mustang | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | F 11 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 794 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 410 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 59 L |