1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2002 BMW Z3
To start off, 2002 BMW Z3 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 BMW Z3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW Z3 (185 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW Z3 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW Z3 weights approximately 605 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 BMW Z3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 BMW Z3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 2002 BMW Z3 | |
Make | DKW | BMW |
Model | F 11 | Z3 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 889 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 51 L |