1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2002 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 5,212 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (220 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1129 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW F 11 | 2002 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | DKW | Dodge |
| Model | F 11 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 889 cc | 5212 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 220 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1879 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3530 mm |
