1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2003 Volvo V50
To start off, 2003 Volvo V50 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2003 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo V50 (161 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Volvo V50 weights approximately 649 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 2003 Volvo V50 | |
Make | DKW | Volvo |
Model | F 11 | V50 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 889 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1399 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 62 L |