1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 1014 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW F 11 | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | DKW | Jeep |
| Model | F 11 | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 889 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 195 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 8.8:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1764 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 78 L |
