1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2004 Mazda 6
To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 1,839 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda 6 (119 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mazda 6 weights approximately 670 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 2004 Mazda 6 | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | F 11 | 6 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 889 cc | 1839 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 8.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 64 L |