1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2004 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2004 Toyota Camry is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Camry (225 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Camry weights approximately 864 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW F 11 | 2004 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | DKW | Toyota |
| Model | F 11 | Camry |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 889 cc | 3310 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1614 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |
