1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2005 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2005 Ford Econoline is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Econoline (197 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 159 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1575 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Econoline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Econoline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW F 11 | 2005 Ford Econoline | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | F 11 | Econoline |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 889 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 2325 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3510 mm |
