1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 561 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 DKW F 11. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW F 11 | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | F 11 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 889 cc | 2983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1311 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 64 L |
