1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2005 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XK is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XK (390 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 352 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XK weights approximately 1083 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 2005 Jaguar XK | |
Make | DKW | Jaguar |
Model | F 11 | XK |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 889 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1833 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 75 L |