1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2005 Marcos TSO
To start off, 2005 Marcos TSO is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 5,666 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Marcos TSO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Marcos TSO (475 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 437 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Marcos TSO should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Marcos TSO weights approximately 420 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Marcos TSO is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Marcos TSO. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW F 11 | 2005 Marcos TSO | |
| Make | DKW | Marcos |
| Model | F 11 | TSO |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 889 cc | 5666 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 475 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1160 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2290 mm |
