1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2005 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 1,796 cc, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C (189 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mercedes-Benz C weights approximately 654 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Mercedes-Benz C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Mercedes-Benz C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 2005 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | DKW | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | F 11 | C |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 889 cc | 1796 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 8.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1404 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 62 L |