1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC90 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC90 (208 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 1345 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 DKW F 11. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW F 11 | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | DKW | Volvo |
| Model | F 11 | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 889 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 2095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 72 L |
