1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ranger (206 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11.
Because 2006 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 DKW F 11. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Ranger (324 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DKW F 11. (71 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | F 11 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 794 cc | 4016 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 206 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 324 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 100.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 84.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 84 L |