1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 208 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11.
Because 2008 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DKW F 11. (71 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 2008 Holden UTE | |
Make | DKW | Holden |
Model | F 11 | UTE |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 794 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 71 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |