1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 109 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11.
Because 2009 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 DKW F 11. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | F 11 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 794 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2490 mm |