1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2009 Ford Escape
To start off, 2009 Ford Escape is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 2,976 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Escape (171 HP @ 6550 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Escape weights approximately 216 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Ford Escape is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 DKW F 11. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Escape will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW F 11 | 2009 Ford Escape | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | F 11 | Escape |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 889 cc | 2976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 171 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6550 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 62 L |
