1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2009 Lotus Exige
To start off, 2009 Lotus Exige is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Lotus Exige is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lotus Exige (240 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lotus Exige should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11.
Because 2009 Lotus Exige is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Lotus Exige. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lotus Exige (231 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DKW F 11. (71 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Lotus Exige will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 2009 Lotus Exige | |
Make | DKW | Lotus |
Model | F 11 | Exige |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 794 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 231 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 40 L |