1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 2,487 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 6 weights approximately 375 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | F 11 | 6 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 889 cc | 2487 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 170 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |