1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 3,725 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 579 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 DKW F 11. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW F 11 | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
| Make | DKW | Mazda |
| Model | F 11 | CX-9 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 889 cc | 3725 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 273 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1329 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 76 L |
