1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2009 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2009 Nissan Rogue is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Rogue (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 599 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Nissan Rogue is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 DKW F 11. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Rogue will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Rogue (237 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DKW F 11. (71 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan Rogue will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW F 11 | 2009 Nissan Rogue | |
| Make | DKW | Nissan |
| Model | F 11 | Rogue |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 794 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 171 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 95.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 83.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1329 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 60 L |
