1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2009 Volvo C30
To start off, 2009 Volvo C30 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo C30 (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW F 11 | 2009 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | DKW | Volvo |
| Model | F 11 | C30 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 889 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 18.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |
