1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2010 Fiat Croma
To start off, 2010 Fiat Croma is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Fiat Croma (145 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Fiat Croma weights approximately 190 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW F 11 | 2010 Fiat Croma | |
| Make | DKW | Fiat |
| Model | F 11 | Croma |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 889 cc | 2198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2710 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 62 L |
