1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2010 Ford Ka
To start off, 2010 Ford Ka is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ka (68 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford Ka (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DKW F 11. (71 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford Ka will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW F 11 | 2010 Ford Ka | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | F 11 | Ka |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 794 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 68 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 71 Nm | 106 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 68 mm | 74.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 75.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.2:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 40 L |
