1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2010 Peugeot 3008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 3008 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 3008 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 3008 (148 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 3008 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11.
Because 2010 Peugeot 3008 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 DKW F 11. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 3008 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 3008 (340 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DKW F 11. (71 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 3008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 2010 Peugeot 3008 | |
Make | DKW | Peugeot |
Model | F 11 | 3008 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 794 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1837 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1639 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2613 mm |