1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2012 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2012 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Land Rover LR2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover LR2 (230 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Land Rover LR2 weights approximately 1025 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Land Rover LR2 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 DKW F 11. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 DKW F 11 | 2012 Land Rover LR2 | |
| Make | DKW | Land Rover |
| Model | F 11 | LR2 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 889 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 38 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 750 kg | 1775 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4496 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1908 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2659 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |
