1963 DKW F 11 vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Volvo C30 (114 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C30 weights approximately 721 kg more than 1963 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C30 (270 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 DKW F 11. (71 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
1963 DKW F 11 | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | DKW | Volvo |
Model | F 11 | C30 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 794 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 71 Nm | 270 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3970 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 60 L |